I

n 2008, the name Fannie Mae jumped into the foreground for many Americans. The financial crisis of that year illuminated the scope of property loans in its financial portfolio. In 2021, however, the agency made news on a different front: it is the largest green bond issuer in the world. These programs can secure capital for building owners who want to improve their properties' energy and water efficiency. Are green bond programs like this working as intended? First, what does Fannie Mae do again? The company is a government-sponsored enterprise that buys existing mortgages from banks. "By investing in mortgages, Fannie Mae creates more liquidity for lenders, including banks, thrifts, and credit unions, which then allows them to underwrite or fund more mortgages," explains Investopia (https://bit.ly/3vclON1). Fannie Mae is now an enormous player in the energy improvement market. Between 2012 and 2020, it dedicated $88 billion to its green bond program (https:// bit.ly/3n7tn4f; https://bit.ly/3aBrTJo). Building owners can use these programs for building upgrades. Investors can back green bonds, believing the upgraded buildings in these mortgage packages stay ahead of the curve. Landlords or owners who are going green are presumably a safer bet for investors. Everything sounds great. However, Greenbiz.com describes how a lack of proper government regulations can result in the misuse of green bond funds collected for environmentally friendly projects, which may go unpenalized. "This relative paucity of standards for value, legitimacy and structure should give novice investors and issuers some pause," the site cautions (https://bit.ly/3ACTYL7). "Many countries, too, are issuing green bonds before they have finalized what makes a bond green or what makes a green investment bondable." If you issue green bonds and want to provide some direction for how money should be spent, you can suggest the voluntary process outlined in the Green Bond Principles developed by the International Capital Market Association (https://bit.ly/3mTkPO0). A portion of the GBP standard abstract reads: "By recommending that issuers report on the use of green bond proceeds, the GBP promote[s] a step change in transparency that facilitates the tracking of funds to environmental projects, while simultaneously aiming to improve insight into their estimated impact." Some green bond issuers, such as the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, take an additional verification step. They use a second party to verify the upgrades reported. This extra step is good for credibility, but is not required in the United States. It also depends on the second party to know their way around an energy or water audit. But as we learned in 2008, just because the banking industry deems mortgages highly rated or adheres to voluntary best practices does not make it true. In 2008, many top-rated mortgage blocks were full of bad loans. For the green bond program to live up to its significant

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY

60

phc November 2021 www.phcppros.com

BY MAX ROHR

Where would we be without them?

Green Bonds